THE BRIEF RESILIENCE SCALE - A ROMANIAN-LANGUAGE ADAPTATION
Keywords:
Brief Resilience Scale, reliability, validityAbstract
The purpose of this article is to present the
adaptation of the Brief Resilience Scale developed by
Smith et al. to the Romanian language. The scale was
applied in two different samples at different times. In
the first study, conducted on a sample composed of 198
military students, factor analysis revealed the presence
of a single factor, weakly charged with five of the six
items of the scale.The internal validity coefficient of the
scale is low, but convergent validity is well supported
by strong correlations between the level of resilience
and other measured constructs (perceived stress, self-
efficacy and self-regulation). In the second study,
conducted on one sample made up of 166 employees in
the Romanian military system, all items satisfactorily
loaded on a single factor and Cronbach's alpha value
indicated good internal consistency of the scale.The
staff resilience level was positively correlated with skill
use and social support at work and negatively with
perceived  stress.  The  t-test  highlighted  a  strong
association between professional status of respondents
and  their  level  of  resilience,  military  personnel
obtaining higher average than civilian personnel as well
as a weak association between the respondents' gender
and their level of resilience, men achieving higher
average than women. Students have lower resilience
scores than staff whilst also reporting higher stress
levels. Although BRS did not prove satisfactory
psychometric properties for the sample of military
students, it proved suitable for the sample of employees
of the Romanian military system.
References
Amat, S., Subhan, Mhd., Jaafar, W. M. W, Mahmud, Z., Johari, K. S. K.
(2014). Evaluation and Psychometric Status of the Brief Resilience
Scale in a Sample of Malaysian International Students, Asian Social
Science; Vol. 10, No. 18/2014, ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Cohen, S., Kamark, T., Mermelstein, R. (1983). A Global Measure of
Perceived Stress, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol.24,
No.4 (Dec 1983), 385-396,
http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~scohen/globalmeas83.pdf
Diehl, M., Semegon, A. B., Schwarzer, R. (2006). Assessing attention
control in goal pursuit: A component of dispositional self-
regulation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86,306-317. doi:
1207/s15327752jpa8603_06
Juncu, I., Totolici, P., Radu, I., Duţu, P., Radu, V. (1994), Agresiune şi
apărare psihologică, Editura Academiei de Înalte Studii Militare,
BucureÅŸti
Mello Alves, M. G. de, Chor, D., Faerstein, E., Lopes, S., Loureiro, C.,
Werneck, G., (2004). Short version of the “job stress scaleâ€: a
Portuguese-language adaptation, Rev. Saúde Pública 2004;38(2),
http://www. scielo.br/pdf/rsp/v38n2/en_19774.pdf
Meredith, L.S., Sherbourne, C. D., Gaillot, S.G., Hansell, L., Ritschard,
H. V., Parker, A. M., Wrenn, G. (2011), Promoting Psychological
Resilience in the U.S. Military, Published by the RAND
Corporation, http://www.rand.org
Rășcanu, R. (coord). (2006). Introducere în psihodiagnoza clinică -
Partea a 2-a, Editura Universității din București, ISBN (10) 973-
-177-1
Rutter, M. (2006). Implications of Resilience Concepts for scientific
Understanding, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1094: 1-12 (2006), New York
Academy of Sciences, doi: 10.1196/annals.1376.002,
http://www.hqlo.com/content/pdf/1477-7525-9-8.pdf
Smith, B.W., Dalen, J., Wiggings, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P.,
Bernard, J. (2008). The Brief Resilience Scale: assessing the ability
to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15,
-200.