THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL IN EXPLAINING THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF ROMANIAN STUDENTS

Authors

  • Blanca Giorgiana GRAMA Associate professor, PhD, “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu
  • Daniel Nicoleta BOTONE Ph.D., Professor Assistent Department of Journalism, Public Relations, Sociology and Psychology Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu

Keywords:

personality factors, academic performance, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness

Abstract

The aim of this article is to highlight the
relationship between the personality factors of the Five-
Factor model and the academic performance for 751
Romanian students within the same university. In
investigating the personality parameters, we have used the
NEO PI-R Personality Inventory and the semi-structured
interview technique. The results were correlated with the
academic performance achieved by the students in different
exam sessions. The academic performance have strong
connections with at least 3 factors of the five-factor model
of personality; for romanian students, Conscientiousness,
Agreeableness and Neuroticism (emotional stability) are
key elements in achieving a high academic performance.
Assertiveness dimension (Extraversion factor), along with
the Openness and Conscientiousness factors are significant
predictors for romanian academic performance. Further,
limits and implications of the research were discussed.

References

Alhathli, M., Masthoff, J., & Siddharthan, A. (2017). Should Learning

Material’s Selection be Adapted to Learning Style and Personality?

Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments. In Adjunt

Proceedings of UMAP Conference. ACM, 6. UMAP’17, July 9-12,

Bratislava, Slovakia.

Almagor, M., Tellegen, A, & Waller, N.G. (1995). The big-seven model: A

cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic

dimensions of natural language trait-descriptors. Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, 69, 300-307.

Anderson, G. & Viswesvaran, C. (1998, April). An update of the validity of

personality scales in personnel selection: A meta-analysis of studies

published after 1992. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of

the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.

Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and

job performance: a meta-analiysis. Personnel Psychology, 1991, 44, 1-

Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M.J., & Mount, M.K. (1998). Relating

Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team

Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.

Barrick, M.R. & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the

relationship between the Big Five personality dimensions and job

performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.

Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. & Strauss, J.P. (1993). Conscientiousness and

performance of sales representatives: Test for the mediating effect of

goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.

Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and

Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We

Know and Where Do We Go Next. International Journal of

Selection and Assessment, 9 (1/2), 9-30.

Benet-Martínez V. & John, O.P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes Across Cultures

and Ethnic Groups: Multitrait Multimethod Analyses of the Big Five in

Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,

, 729-750.

Benet-Martinez, V., & Waller, N.G. (1997). Further evidence of the crosscultural

generality of the Big Seven model: indigenous and imported

Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality, 65, 567-598.

Bouchard T.J., Jr. (1997). The genetics of personality. In: Blum, K., Noble E.P.,

Sparkes, R.S., Chen, T.H.J., (Eds.) & Cull, J.G., Handbook of Psychiatric

Genetics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 273–296.

Bouchard T.J.Jr, & Loehlin, J.C. (2001). Genes, evolution and personality.

Behavior Genetics, 31(3), 243-73.

Cheung, F. M., & Leung, K. (1998). Indigenous personality measures: Chinese

examples. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 233-248.

Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Hui Yeh, K.

(2008) Relevance of Openness as a Personality Dimension in Chinese.

Aspects of its Cultural Relevance, Journal of Cross-Cultural

Psychology, 39(1),81-108.

Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in

clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological

Assessment, 4, 5-13, 20-22.

Costa, P.T., Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (2009) adaptat Iliescu, D., Minulescu, M.,

Nedelcea, C., Ispas, D. NEO PI-R Manual tehnic, Alba Iulia: Editura

Sinapsis.

Derue, S. D., Nahrgang, J.D., Wellmann, N., & Humphrey, S.E. (2011). Trait

and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and meta-analytic

test of heir relative validity. Personnel Psychology; 64, 7–52.

Di Blas, L. & Forzi, M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality

descriptors in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12

(2), 75-101.

Grama, B.G., Botone, D.N., & Raulea C. (2016). The psychological profile of

the medical student. Acta Medica Transilvanica. 21; 2: 6-39.

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M. Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M.

(2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of

personality variation among forager–farmers in the Bolivian

Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 354-

Harris K., English, T., Harms, D.P., Gross J.J., & Jackson J.J. (2017). Why are

extraverts more satisfied? Personality, social experiences and subjective

well-being in college. European Journal of Personality, 31 (2); 170-186.

Henrich, J.,Heine, S.J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD.

Nature, 466; 29.

Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., & Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and

Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. USA:

McGraw Hill.

Hunter, J.E. & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of Meta-analysis, Newbury Park,

CA: Sage Publications.

Jarrell, A., Harley, J.M., Lajoie, S. & Naismith, L. (2017). Success, failure and

emotions: examining the relationship between performance feedback

and emotions in diagnostic reasoning. Educational Technology

Research and Development, 65 (5), 1263-1284.

Jing Yu Zhang & Jung Kee Kim (2017). The Relationships between

Communication Factors and Educational Effects: Focusing on

Confucius Institutes’ Students. Speech and Communication. Korean

Communications Association. Volume 16, 33, ISSN: 1598-77522002,

-72

Judge, T.A., Piccolo, R.F. & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of

leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait

paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (6), 855–875.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for

cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-

Markus, H. R & Kitayama S. (2013). Cultures and Selves: A Cycle of Mutual

Constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4) 420–430.

McCrae, R. R. (1994), Openess to Experience: Expanding the boundaries of

Factor V. Eur. J. Pers., 8: 251–272.

McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential

openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 323-337.

McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Del Pilar, G.H., Rolland, J.P., & Parker W.D.,

(1998). Cross-Cultural Assessment of the Five-Factor Model. The

Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural

Psychology, 29 (1), 171-188.

McCrae, R.R. & Costa, P.T. Jr. (1997) Personality Trait Structure as a Human

Universal. American Psychologist, 52, (5), 509-516.

Motel, L., & Stoll. A. (2015, November 21). The changing face of leadership: A

meta-analysis of personality traits as predictors of leadership

effectiveness over time. Essay presented at National Communication

Association 101st Annual Conference, Las Vegas, NV;

Ones, D.S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C. & Judge, T.A. (2007). In Support of

personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology,

, 995-1027.

Salgado, J.F. (2003). Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM

personality measures. Journal of Occupational and Organizational

Psychology; 76, 323-346.

Salgado, J.F. (1997). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Job

Performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 82 (1), 30-43.

Strickhouser, J. E., Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2017). Does personality predict

health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychology, 36(8), 797-

Szirmak, Z. & DeRaad, B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian

personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95-117.

Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N. & Rothstein M. (1991). Personality measures as

predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel

Psychology, 44, 703-742.

Yamagata, S., Suzuki, A., Ando J.,Ono, Y., Kijima, N., Yoshimura, K.,

Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., Spinath, F.M., Livesley, W.

J. & Jang, K.L. (2006). Is the Genetic Structure of Human Personality

Universal? A Cross- Cultural Twin Study From North America, Europe,

and Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(6), 987-

Downloads

Published

2018-11-29