Factors influencing the choice of a university degree: the case of physical activity, recreation and sport tourism studies

Authors

  • Robert Çitozi Sports University of Tirana, Faculty of Physical Activity and Recreation
  • Ferdinand Mara Sports University of Tirana. Faculty of Physical Activity and Recreation
  • Spartak Bozo Sports University of Tirana. Faculty of Physical Activity and Recreation

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyse students´ expectations that have an
influence on choosing Physical Activity, Recreation and Sport Tourism as an
academic major. According to the analysis of this research on the reasons for
choosing Fitness, Recreation and Sport Tourism studies at Sports University
of Tirana, the conclusions reached show that among multiple factors, the expectations
of having collaborative and situated learning experiences are one
of the main reasons for choosing these studies, as well as the a lot of job opportunities
that this degree offers. Methods and subjects. The final cohort
involved in this study was comprised of 320 students, of whom 35.94% were
women and 64.06% men. Almost half of the participants (48%) were aged
between,18-20 and 39% were aged between, 21-22. This article explores the
expectations that have driven students in their choice of a Leisure and Recreation
academic major, considering that if the studies match the expectations
of the students, the probability of success in the learning process will
increase. With this conceptual framework in mind, the following research
questions have been developed: 1.What are the student´s curriculum and job
expectations for choosing RFST studies? 2. In which degree can situated and
collaborative learning be found among those expectations? The third research 

question refers to the level of rationality or emotionality that emerges in the
expression of the expectations. Results. Over 92% of the participants were
full-time students and 8% were part-time students. Participants are coming to
follow studies in FPAR (36.67%), for fitness instructor, (25.14%) sport tourism
guide, 13.12% rehabilitation sciences, (11.92%) touristic animator and
(13.15%) other specialities.

References

Anderson jr, Greeno jg, Reder lm, Simon ha. (2000). Perspectives

on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 229

(4):11-13.

Brookes M. (2003). Evaluating the ‘Student Experience’: An Approach

to Managing and Enhancing Quality in Higher Education.

Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education,

(1):17-26. doi:10.3794/johlste.21.27.

Brown Js, Collins A, Duguid P. (1989). Situated cognition and

the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1):32-42.

Cochran-Smith M, Lytle Sl. (1999). Relationships of knowledge

and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad

and P.D. Pearson, Review of Research in Education, 24:249-

doi:10.2307/1167272.

Cochran-Smith M, Lytle Sl. (2011). Changing Perspectives on

Practitioner Research. Learning Landscapes, 4(2):17-23.

Damasio A. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: G.P. Putnam’s

Sons.

Damasio A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion

and the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann.

Darling-Hammond L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement

of teaching: Research, policy and practice for democratic

education. Educational Researcher, 6:5-17.

Dewey J. (1963). Experience and Education. New York: Collier

Books.

Dunbar R, Shultz S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science,

:1344-1347.

Eco U. (200 4). It’s not what you know… The Guardian, 3 April, 7.

Glaser Bg, Strauss Al. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory:

Strategies for qualitative research. Nueva York: Aldine.

Holland Jl. (1996). Exploring careers with a typology: What we

have learned and some new directions. American Psychologist,

(4):397-406.

Huber Gl. Aquad (2012). Six. Manual for the Analysis of Qualitative

data. Tübingen: Ingeborg Huber Verlag.

Jawitz J. (2009). Learning in the academic workplace: the harmonization

of collective and the individual habitus. Studies in

Higher Education, 34(6):601-614.

Johnson Dw, Johnson Rt. (2009). An educational psychology

success story: interdependence theory and cooperative learning.

Educational Researcher, 38(5):365-379.

Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar,

Straus and Giroux. Books.

King M, Morison I, Reed G, Stachow G. (1999). Student feedback

systems in the business school: A departmental model.

Quality Assurance in Education, 7(2):90-100.

Leher J. (2012). Why we don’t believe in science. The New

Yorker, June 7.

Martínez Ma, Sauleda N, Huber G. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints

of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and

Teacher Education, 17:965-977.

Plumton C. (2005). An exploration of factors involved in choosing recreation as an academic major. Thesis Master of Arts.

University of Manitoba. Dissertation Abstracts International,

(03),

Raymore La, Berno T. (1996). Undergraduate parks, recreation, and leisure education: Variables associated with recruitment and implications for retention. Schole: A journal of leisure studies and recreation education, 10:35-43.

Super De. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career

development. In: D. Brown, L. Brooks, and Associates (Eds.).

Career choice and development (2nd Ed.), Pp. 89-97.

Tversky A, Kahneman D. (1991). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211:453-458.

Walker M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies. Glasgow: Mc-Graw Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-14