EVALUATING TEACHER PERFORMANCE IN THE UNITED STATES
Keywords:
education system, teachers evaluation polities, standards-based reform, teacherspractice, teachers performance,Abstract
Teaching is a complex task. It requires academic content knowledge, pedagogical
knowledge and skills, organizational skills, understanding of human development,
and interpersonal skills to engage with students, colleagues, and, in the United
States, increasingly diverse families. Given its complexity, its evaluation likely
needs to be multifaceted. This article first briefly presents the policy context for
teacher evaluation in the United States. It then examines policies under which
students’ scores from standardized tests have been the essential source of data to
evaluate teacher performance and describes how these evaluation systems
influence teachers’ classroom practice. Finally, it briefly considers evaluation
systems that may better reflect, inform, and support the complex task of teaching.
References
Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the Bubble: “Educational Triage†and the Texas
Accountability System. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231-268.
Campbell, D.T. (1976). Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change. Occasional Paper
Series, Paper #8, The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College. Available at
http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/pubs/ops/ops08.pdf
Dappen L. & Isernhagen, J.C. (2005) Nebraska STARS: Assessment for learning. Planning
and Changing, 36, 3&4, pp. 147–156.
Espinoza, D., Saunders, R., Kini, T., and Darling-Hammond, L. (2018). Taking the long view:
State efforts to solve teacher shortages by strengthening the profession. Palo
Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. Available at
https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Long_View_REPORT.pdf
Haertel, E. H. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student
test scores. Available at www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICANG14.pdf
Kirp, D. L. (2013). Improbable scholars: The rebirth of a great American school system and a
strategy for America's schools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koretz, D. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Kornhaber, M.L., Barkauskas, N.J., Griffith, K.M., Sausner, E.B., and Mahfouz, J. (2017).
The Common Core's promises and pitfalls from the perspectives of policy entrepreneurs and
ground-level actors. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 385-412.
Leachman, M., Masterson, K., and Figueroa, E. (2017). A punishing decade for school
funding. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Available at
https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-budget-and-tax/a-punishing-decade-for-school-funding
McCray, V. (2018, October 9). With hymns and prayers, ex-APS educator reports for prison
in cheating scandal. The Atlanta Constitution-Journal. Available at
https://www.ajc.com/news/local-education/educators-convicted-aps-cheating-scandalreport-
for-prison-today/tAZrJhxSzDVieSHvVjrr2J/
National Center for Education Statistics (2018). Fast Facts. Available at
https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372
The Nation’s Report Card, Achievement Gap Dashboard (n.d.).
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/dashboards/achievement_gaps.aspx
Neal, D, and Schanzenbach, D.W. (2010). Left Behind by Design: Proficiency Counts and
Test-Based Accountability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 263-283
Nichols, S. L., and Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing
corrupts America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
O'Day, J. and Smith, M. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. Fuhrman
(Ed.), Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System (pp. 250-312). San
Francisco: Jossey-
Ravitch, D. (2014). Reign of error. New York: Vintage Books/Random House
Smith, J. E., and Kovacs, P. E. (2011). The impact of standards based reform on teachers:
the case of ‘No Child Left Behind.’ Teachers and Teaching, 17(2). Available at
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13540602.2011.539802
Smith, M. S., and O'Day, J. (1991). Putting the pieces together: Systemic school reform
(CPRE Policy Brief, RB-06-4/91). New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in
Education.
Strauss, V. (2016, May 10). Judge calls evaluation of N.Y. teacher ‘arbitrary’ and ‘capricious’
in case against new U.S. secretary of education. The Washington Post. Available at
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/05/10/judge-callsevaluation-
of-n-y-teacher-arbitrary-and-capricious-in-case-against-new-u-s-secretary-ofeducation/?
noredirect=on&utm_term=.1ecb67a2caea
U.S. Department of Education, Laws & Guidance, Elementary & Secondary Education, Part I
-- General Provisions. Section 1905 (No Child Left Behind),