EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY COHESION: HOW TRAINING IN CHILDCARE ADDS BENEFIT
Abstract
This paper examines the education of the semi-voluntary pre-school workforce in England in terms of the benefits to local communities to capture its utility in real terms.
It revisits qualitative research data collected as biographical narratives from ten cohorts of adult women training to work in childcare in English pre-schools during the political reforms of the New Labour Government, 1997-2010.
It examines the advantages to their local communities of the women gaining a qualification and found positive educational, social and economic consequences beyond the direct benefits to the women and their own families and the children with whom they worked. The training also created a local resource, raising the level of education received by local children and the learning levels in the communities in which the women lived. There were clear economic benefits in terms of women returning to work and low-cost upskilling of local provision for children but also less tangible changes. There was a greater incidence of networking and social cohesion as a consequence of students broadening their outlook on life.
This study supports recommendations that policy makers should be careful to protect initiatives that work, and that grew up slowly to serve the needs of local people. The benefits to local communities may be far greater than those derived from changes imposed from above in the name of “raising standards†and “establishing cost-effective childcareâ€, and once lost such initiatives are hard to recreate
References
Audit Commission (1996a). Counting to five. London: HMSO.
Audit Commission (1996b). Under fives count. London: HMSO.
Ball, C. (1994). Start right. London: Royal Society of Arts.
CACE (Central Advisory Council for Education) (1967). Children and their primary schools (The Plowden Report). London: HMSO.
Craig, G., Burchardt, T. & Gordon, D. (2008). Social justice and public policy: Seeking fairness in diverse societies. Bristol: Policy Press.
DES (1990). Starting with quality (The Rumbold Report) London: Department of Education and Science.
Festinger, L (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: human nature and reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Hodge, M. (2000, February 3). Matter of fact, BBC1.
Hollway, W. & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
Landes, J. B. (1998). Feminism, the public and the private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
National Commission on Education (1993). Learning to succeed. London: Heinemann for Paul Hamlyn Foundation.
Parrott, A. (2007). Testing times. Adults Learning. November, 19(3), 24-27.
Parsons, T. & Bales, R. F. (1956). Family, socialization and interaction process. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Playgroup movement website (2014). Retrieved December 5, from http://www.playgroupmovement.org.uk/.
Pre-school Learning Alliance (2013). Our history. Retrieved December 5, from https://www.pre-school.org.uk/about-us/history.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sen, A. (1987) The Standard of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Simon, A., Owen, C., Moss, P., Petrie, P., Cameron, C., Potts, P. & Wigfall, V. (2007). Working together: Volume 1, Secondary analysis of the Labour Force Survey to map the numbers and characteristics of the occupations working within social care, childcare, nursing and education. London: Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, T. (1999). Movers and shakers: High politics and the origins of the English National Curriculum. In B. Moon & P. Murphy. Curriculum in context.
London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
Thatcher, M. (1972). Written statement launching education white paper (A framework for expansion), 6 December, DES Press release. Retrieved December 1, from the Thatcher Archive, http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/102233.
Usher, R. (2000). Deconstructive happening: Ethical moment. In H. Simons & R. Usher. Situated ethics in educational research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Waldegrave, H. (2013). Centres of excellence? The role of children’s centres in early intervention. London: Policy exchange. Retrieved December 5, from http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/images/publications/centres%20of%20excellence.pdf.
West, L. (1996). Beyond fragments: Adults, motivation and higher education, a biographical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
Wright, H. R. (2011). Women studying childcare: Integrating lives through adult education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
Wright, H. R. (2012). Childcare, children and capability. Cambridge Journal of Education (Special Issue on children and capability approach), September, 42(3), 409-424.
Wright, H. R. (2013a). Choosing to compromise: Women studying childcare in an English further education college. Gender and Education, 25(2), 206-219.
Wright, H. R. (2013b). From individual choice to social good. Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning, UALL Conference Special Issue, 3(2), 141-148.
Wright, H. R. (2013c). In search of stability: Women studying childcare. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(1), 89-108.
Wright, H. R. (2014). The child in society. London: Sage.
