LEARNER IN THE CONTEXT OF THINKING SKILLSREALITIES AND CHALLENGES FROM CLASSROOM

<doi>10.24250/JPE/2/2020/CT

Authors

  • Cristina TRIPON University of Bucharest

Keywords:

autonomy; critical thinking; 21st century skills.

Abstract

Education must to prepare for successful lives as adult citizens. In
order to achieve that huge challenge, schools need to have
clarity about their roles, about the patterns of future needs, about
the teachers needs to selling the learning and making it
irresistible.One of the most common criticisms aimed at young
learners new to the workplace is that they lack initiative. They
cannot solve problems for themselves and constantly need to be
told what to do. So, the important job of schools is to ensure that
children feel that they are responsible for their development and
that it is thay who have the power to control their own lives. The
majority of children who struggle within the system do so because
of an inability to understand their own feelings and a
fundamental lack of self-worth.The main objective of the research
was to identify the degree of autonomy of the adolescent students
from the studied high school classes. At the same time, the aim
was to ascertain to what extent the teachers contribute to the
construction and stimulation of the autonomy of the students, by
studying the term of autonomy from the perspective of the image
that the students and teachers have.

Author Biography

Cristina TRIPON, University of Bucharest

PhD. Assistent Lecturer Teacher Training and Social Sciences Department Politehnica

References

Bagheri, M., Aeen, L.(2011). The impact of practicing autonomy on the

writing proficiency of Iraninan intermediate EFL learners. Pan Pacific

Association of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 1-13.

Brindley, G. (1990). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL

programme design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.) The second language

curriculum (pp. 63-78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Care, E., Vista, A., Kim, H., & Anderson, K. (2019). Education system

alignment for 21st Century Skills: Focus on assessment. Washington, DC:

Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/educationsystem-

alignment-for-21st-century-skills/

Chaffee, J. (1992). Teaching critical thinking across the curriculum. New

Directions for Community Colleges, 77, 25-35.

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st Century Skills

and competencies in primary education. International Journal of

Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.eiji.

net/dosyalar/iji_2018_3_1.pdf

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of

Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.

Dewan, S. & Sarkar, U. (2017). From Education to Employability. Just Jobs

Network and UNICEF.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for

purposes of educational assessment and instruction—The Delphi report.

Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

Hattie, J. A. C. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on

achievement. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

Jaberian, H., Vista, A., & Care, E. (2018). Monitoring for 21st Century

Skills: Solutions adopted by the United Nations. Washington, DC:

Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus

development/2018/11/26/monitoring-for-21st-century-skills/

Jiménez Raya, M., Vieira., F.(2008). Teacher Development for Learner

Autonomy: Images and Issues from Five Projects. In Pedagogy for

Autonomy in Language Education: Theory, Practice and Teacher

Education, edited by M. Jiménez Raya and T. Lamb, 283–302. Dublin:

Authentik.

Little, D. (2007). Language Learner Autonomy: Some Fundamental

Considerations Revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching

(1): 14–29. doi:10.2167/illt040.0.

Moore, B.N. & Parker, R. (1994). Critical Thinking. Mountain View. CA:

Mayfield.

Murphy, L. (2011). Autonomy in context: A tale of two learners. In D.

Gardner (Ed.), Fostering autonomy in language learning, (pp. 17-27).

Gaziantep: Zirve University

Noom, M; Dekovic, M; Meeus, M.(2001). Conceptual analysis and

measurement of adolescent autonomy, Journal of Young and Adolescence,

(5), 577-595.

Paiva, V. L. M. O. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in second

language acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. In

G. Murray, X. Gao, & L. Lamb, Identity, motivation and autonomy in

second language (pp. 57-75). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Pemberton, R., & Nix, M. (2012). Practices of critical thinking, criticality

and learner autonomy. In K. Irie& A. Stewart (Eds.), Proceedings of the

JALT Learner Development SIG Realizing Autonomy Conference,

[Special issue] Learning Learning, 19(2), 79-94. Retrieved from http://ldsig.

org/LL/ 19two/pemberton-nix.pdf.

Prensky, M. (2012). From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful

Essays for 21st Century Learning. Thousand Oaks, Calif., Corwin

Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school

engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wenzel & A.

Wigfield (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of

motivation at school (p. 171–195). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Rolleston, C. (2018). 21st Century Skills: Upskilling for an uncertain future?

[Web log post]. Retrieved from

https://www.younglives.org.uk/content/21st-century-skills-upskillinguncertain-

future.

Stahl, N.N, Stahl, R.J.(1991). We can agree after all! Achievement consensus

for a critical thinking component of a gifted program using the Delphi

Technique. Roeper Review, 14(2), 79-88.

Simon, H. A., & Kaplan, C. A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive science. In

M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (p. 1–47). The MIT

Press.

Scott, Cynthia, L. S. (2015). The futures of learning 2: What kind of learning

for the 21st century? (ERF Working Paper No. 14). Paris: UNESCO

Education Research and Foresight.

https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000242996

Sternberg, R.J., Subotnik, R.F. (2006). Optimizing Student Success in School

with the Other Three Rs: Reasoning, Resilience, and Responsibility.

Research in Educational Productivity Series. Charlotte, NC, Information

Age Publishing. http://books.google.

com/9Cthe+application+of+intelligence,+creativity,+and+knowledge+for+

a+common+good.%E2%80%9D&source=gbs_navlinks_s (Accessed 21st

September 2020).

Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom:

Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the

school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

Wagner, T., Kegan, R., Lahey, L., Lemons, R., Garnier, J., Helsing, D.,

Howell, A. and Rasmussen, H. (2006). Change Leadership: A Practical

Guide to Transforming Our Schools. San Francisco, Calif., Jossey-Bass.

Veugelers, W. (2011). Introduction: Linking autonomy and humanism. In W.

Veugelers (Ed), Education and humanism: Linking autonomy and

humanity (pp. 1-9), Boston: Sense Publishers

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international

frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national

curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies,44(3),299–

doi:10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Wenden, A. (1998). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Great Britain:

Prentice Hall.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-30