QUALITATIVE STUDY REGARDING THE PERCEPTION OF DIRECT PARTICIPANTS IN LEARNING ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT IN THE CONTEXT OF STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS ERASMUS

Authors

  • Alina GIMBUTA Teachers’ Training Centre of Bistrita-Nasaud District
  • Dalia CHIRA National College “LiviuRebreanu”, Bistrita
  • Maria FILI 6th Gymnasio of Heraklion, Crete
  • Cemile BIRINCI Hasan Sadoglu Mesleki ve Teknik Anadolu Lsesi, Istanbul

Keywords:

ERASMUS , project-based learning, non-formal education

Abstract

The effort to update educational standards and learning outcomes
is in the heart of EU’s policies for smart, sustainable and inclusive
growth. Erasmus + programme for education is an effective
instrument for promoting the celebrated principle of lifelong learning
through non-formal experiential activities that fall under the pattern
of project-based learning and enhance the skills and competences of
young people through synergies and cooperation in a multicultural
setting.The present study is based on focus-group interviews, as a
means of qualitative data collection, and explores the first hand
experience of teachers and students from seven different countries
who have participated in an Erasmus+ strategic partnership. The
study navigates through the personal experiences of the participants
and offers full view of their perception of their involvement in the
project.

References

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful

learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning

(PDF)

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the

future. The Clearing House, 83(2)

CEDEFOP (2016). Skills: the new language of education and

training.[online]

COM (2008). Education and training 2010 work programme .Cluster Key

Competences – Curriculum Reform Synthesis Report on Peer Learning

Activities in 2007, Brussels, 14.03.2008

COM (2010). Communication from the Commission. Europe 2020. A

strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels, 3.3.2010.

COM(2010) 2020

COM (2012). Communication from the Commission to the European

Parliament, the Council. The European economic and social committee and

the committee of the regions. Rethinking education: Investing in skills for

better socio-economic outcomes. COM (2012) 669 final. 20.11.2012.

Strasbourg

Fullan, M. &Langworthy, M. (2014) A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies

Find Deep Learning, London: Pearson.

Loyens S. M. M., &Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Instruction based on inquiry.

In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on

Learning and Instruction (pp. 361–381). New York: Routledge

Marilyn Binkley and all (2010). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills.

Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer.

Patrick Griffin, Esther Care, and Barry McGaw (2010), The Changing Role

of Education and Schools. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century

Skills. Springer.

Scott C.L (2015). The Futures of Learning 3. What kind of pedagogies for

the 21st century? Education research and foresight. Working papers.

Unesco

Strobel, J.,& van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL More Effective? A

Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional

Classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1).

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning (PDF)

Walker, A.,& Leary, H. (2009). A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis:

Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and

Assessment Levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning,

(1).

Zimmerman, B. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview

(PDF). Theory into Practice 41(2), 64-70.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-05