FRIENDSHIP IN ADOLESCENCE AND ITS PITFALLS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF RELATIONAL DIALECTICS
Keywords:
adolescence, qualities of friendship, relational dialectics, opposite values,Abstract
This study is based on a descriptive research on a sample of 80 teenagers, built on three fundamental questions: What qualities do adolescents value in a friendship? Are there significant differences between the two genders when it comes to these qualities? What are the main relational dialectics to be solved in the case of friendship in adolescence, starting from the main qualities valued? The investigated teenagers mention the following qualities as relevant: sincerity, help, trust, loyalty, respect, honesty etc. The study also reveals that there are significant differences in terms of gender, in the sense that boys appreciate sincerity more in friendship, while girls appreciate stability more than boys. In terms of the pitfalls of relational dialectics associated with these qualities, they are at the level: expressiveness – protection (sincerity, trust), and independence – dependence (help, stability), respectively, according to W.K. Rawlins. According to Baxter & Montgomery’s theory, there are tensions between the following opposite values regarding in friendship in adolescence: expression – nonexpression, integration – separation (help), stability – change (in the case of girls), expression – nonexpression in the case of boys).References
Albu, G. (2005). O psihologie a educației. Iași: Institutul European.
Baxter, L. A. (2004). A Tale of Two Voices: Relational Dialectics Theory. The journal of family communication, 4(3,4), 181–192. Baxter, L.A., & Montgomery, B.M. (1996). Relating: dialogues & dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
Berndt, Th. J. (2002). Friendship Quality and Social Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science. American Psychological Society, 11(1), 7-10. Brown, B., & Klute, Ch. (2009). Prieteniile, găștile și mulțimile. În G.R. Adams & M.D. Berzonsky (Ed.). Psihologia adolescenței. Manualul Blackwell (pp. 367-383). Iași: Polirom. Dialectical Theory, International Encyclopedia of Marriage and Family. Encyclopedia.com. 27, Retrieved from <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.
Emerson, R.W. (1968). Eseuri. București: Editura pentru Literatură Universală.Erdley, C. A., & Day, H. J. (2017). Friendship in childhood and adolescence. In M. Hojjat & A. Moyer (Ed.). The psychology of friendship (pp. 3-21). New York: Oxford Univesity Press.
Pahl, R. (2000). Despre prietenie. București: Editura Antet.
Rawlins, W. K. & Rawlins, S.P. (2005). Academic Advising as Friendship. NACADA Journal, 25 (2), 10-18.
Rawlins, W. K. (1992, 2008). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Roberts-Griffin, C. P. (2011). What Is a Good Friend: A Qualitative Analysis of Desired Friendship Qualities. Penn McNair Research Journal, (3)1, 1-14. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/mcnair_scholars
Sivertsen, E. (2003). William K. Rawlins’ Dialectical Theory Of Friendship. An exploration of friendship in contemporary USA and a look at the television Sitcom, Friends. Retrieved from http://home.no.net/eskils
***Academia Romană, Institutul de Lingvistică „Iorgu Iordan – Al. Rosetti†(2016). Dicționarul explicativ al Limbii Române. București: Editura Univers Enciclopedic.
