INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION AS A REFLECTION OF THE HOMOGENEITY OF THE TEACHING PROCESS
Keywords:
intercultural education, homogeneity, expectations.Abstract
Although the various aspects of education for international understanding independent individualized best: education for human rights, democracy, disarmament, for tolerance, for the development of man's environment and interculturalism. Also, there are concepts such as multi-ethnic and global education, which correlated with intercultural education. To understand the difference between a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural education, it is necessary to mention the basic characteristics: knowledge of the values of each ethnic group: familiarization major ethnic groups with other groups elements culture, their understanding and respect; enriching students with the knowledge and skills for activities within the profession and contouring general culture; minimization of discrimination and segregation between ethnic groups in schools and society.References
Antonesei, L. (1996) Paideia. Fundamentele culturale ale educaţiei., Iaşi, Ed. Polirom.
Barbu, M. (1973) Dicţionar de citate şi locuţiuni străine., Bucureşti, Ed. Enciclopedică română.
Cucoş, C. (2000) Educaţia. Dimensiuni culturale şi interculturale., Iaşi, Ed. Polirom.
Cucoş, C. Cozma, T. (2001) Locul educaţiei pentru diversitate în ansamblul problematicii educaţiei contemporane, u: Cozma, T. (coord.), O nouă provocare pentru educaţie: interculturalitatea., Iaşi, Ed. Polirom.
Cummins, J: (1986): Bilinqualism in Education. NY: Longman Inc.
Dasen, P. Perregaux, C. (1999) Rey, M., Educaţia interculturală – experienţe, politici, strategii. Iaşi, Ed. Polirom.
Dasen, P. Perregaux, C. Rey, M. (1999) Educaţia interculturală – experienţe, politici, strategii. Iaşi, Ed. Polirom.
Fletcher, T.V., DarrelI, L. S. (1995): Focus on National Context in Academic Achievement: Interaction Effect in Cross-national Studies in Achievement. u: Comparative Eduction review, br. 4 (39).
Fromm, M. (1990): Zur Verbindung quantitative und qualitative Methoden. Pedagogische Rundschau, n.
Fulgosi, A. i dr. (1987): Children of Workers Living Abroad and their Peers in the Native Country; Cognitive and Personalitic Characteristic. Revija za psihologiju, vol. 17.
Fulgosi, A.: Znanstveni status eksperimenta u suvremenoj psihologiji - nesustavno eksperimentiranje, Revija za psihologiju, 1974, br. 2 (4).
Goncz, L. (1988): Kako postati i ostati dvokulturalan i dvojeziÄan uz pomoć Å¡kole u migrantskoj situaciji. Primijenjena psihologija, br. 1-2 (9).
Kao, G. (1995): Asian Americans as Model Minorities? A Look at Their Academic Performance. American Journal of Education, br. 2 (103).
Keeves, J.P. (1988): Educational Research, Methodology, and Measurement: u: International Handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lengrand, P. (1973) Introducere în educaţia permanentă., Bucureşti, Ed. Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Mužić, V (1994a): Atributi kvalitativne in kvantitativne paradigme pedagoškega raziskovanja. Sodobna pedagogika, br 1-2 (45), str. 39-51.
Panţuru, S. (1995) Fundamentele pedagogiei, Braşov, Ed. Universităţii Transilvania.
Rey, M. (1991) Human Rights and Intercultural Education, u: Starkey, H., (ed.) The Chalenge of Human Rights Education. London, Cassell/Council of Europe.
Rey, M. (2000) Piège et défi de l’interculturalisme, u: Education permanente.
