THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH SOCIAL MEDIA USE PERCEPTION AND FAKE PERCEIVED ONLINE PERSONA AWARENESS
Keywords:digital wellbeing; hate speech; mental health; psychological disorders;fake perceived online persona awareness;toxic digital environments and dynamic relationship
The digital identity, online identity or internet persona, is defined as a social identity, an actively constructed presentation of oneself that an individual creates in online communities and digital environments. Considering social identity theory as an explanatory framework, this paper brings evidence on the dynamic relationship between psychological disorders associated with social media use perception and fake perceived online persona awareness in cyberbullying. The concept of digital wellbeing refers to the overall wellbeing index generated by the interaction between humans with social digital environments, like social media platforms. Rethinking mental illness in the light of digital footprints and traces people leave on social media platforms, encompasses the possibility that an event to become toxic and pathologic is exponentially higher in the digital realm that in the real life, as such developing a pathology associated with the usage of digital environment becomes exponentially higher. The question becomes is this new emerging digital pathology really a psychological pathology or just a response to a digital adversity situation/environment/person? Our research team has developed the projects Keeping youth safe from Cyberbullying and Hateâ€™s Journey, aiming to deeper understand the dynamics of different digital aggression aspects in online environments among youth, by creating an online questionnaire composed by single item research questions related to core concepts and perceptions about digital aggression motives and effects. The paperâ€™s focus is on analyzing the psychological disorders associated with social media use perception impact on fake perceived online persona awareness in cyberbullying and digital hate speech incidents, in 206 participants residents of Latvia in 24.8%, Romania 24.8%, Spain 24.8%, and Turkey 25.7%, with an age mean of m=30 years, 39.8% males and 60.2% females. Data analysis results depict that when modelling the effect of psychological disorders associated with social media use perception on fake perceived online persona awareness in cyberbullying, the curvilinear model (19%) is more consistent that the linear model (15%), with both models showing statistical significance. Psychological conclusions and implications in regards to digital wellbeing perspective are discussed.
Andrejevic, M. (2007). Surveillance in the digital enclosure. Commun. Rev.
, 295â€“317. doi: 10.1080/10714420701715365.
Brems, C., Temmerman, M., Graham, T., & Broersma, M. (2016). Personal
branding on Twitter. Digit. J. 5, 443â€“459. doi:
Brooks, A. K., &Anumudu, C. (2016). Identity development in personal
branding instruction. Adult Learn. 27, 23â€“29. doi:
Cederberg, C. D. (2017). Personal branding for psychologists: ethically
navigating an emerging vocational trend. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 48, 183â€“
Chen, C.-P. (2013). Exploring personal branding on YouTube. J. Internet
Comm. 12, 332â€“347. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2013.859041.
Eagar, T., & Dann, S. (2016). Classifying the narrated #selfie: genre typing
human-branding activity. Eur. J. Mark. 50, 1835â€“1857. doi: 10.1108/EJM-
Evans, J. R. (2017). A strategic approach to self-branding. J. Glob. Schol.
Mark. Sci. 27, 270â€“311. doi: 10.1080/21639159.2017.1360146.
Gandini, A. (2016). Digital work: self-branding and social capital in the
freelance knowledge economy. Mark. Theory 16, 123. doi:
Gioia, D. A., Hamilton, A. L., &Patvardhan, S. D. (2014). Image is
everything. Res. Organ. Behav. 34, 129â€“154. doi:
Harris, L., & Rae, A. (2011). Building a personal brand through social
networking. J. Bus. Strat. 32, 14â€“21. doi: 10.1108/02756661111165435.
Johnson, K. M. (2017). The importance of personal branding in social media:
educating students to create and manage their personal brand. Int. J. Educ.
Soc. Sci. 4, 21â€“27.
Rad, D., & Demeter, E. (2020). A Moderated Mediation Effect of Online
Time Spent on Internet Content Awareness, Perceived Online Hate Speech
and Helping Attitudes Disposal of Bystanders. Postmodern Openings,
(2Sup1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2Sup1/182.
Rad, D., Dixon, D., & Rad, G. (2020). Digital outing confidence as a
mediator in the digital behaviour regulation and internet content awareness
relationship. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and
Neuroscience, 11(1), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/11.1/16
Rad, D., Dughi, T., Demeter, E., & Rad, G. (2019). The Dynamics of the
Relationship between Humor and Benevolence as Values.
RevistaRomaneascapentruEducatieMultidimensionala, 11(3), 201-212.
Rad, D., Dughi, T., Roman, A., & Ignat, S. (2019). Perspectives of Consent
Silence in Cyberbullying. Postmodern Openings, 10(2), 57-73.
Rad, D.; Balas, V.; Lile, R.; Demeter, E.; Dughi, T.; Rad, G. Statistical
Properties of a New Social Media Context Awareness Scale (SMCA)â€”A
Preliminary Investigation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5201.
Rad, D., & Demeter, E. (2019). Youth Sustainable Digital Wellbeing.
Postmodern Openings, 10(4), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/96