EDUCATIONAL POLICIES ON INITIAL TEACHER TRAINING FOR PRESCHOOL AND PRIMARY EDUCATION
Keywords:
educational policies, teacher training, initial training, teaching competenceAbstract
Educational policies on teacher education are in a continuous changing and have different forms for schooling levels. Are the routes of teachers' initial training for preschool and primary education still oscillating: medium level and/or higher level? Neither the National Education Act (2011) and any documents of the two agencies concerned and teacher training (ARACIP and ARACIS) do not clarify the relationship between the two routes to professionalize teaching. The initial teacher training for these education segments is only one aspect of the complex issues that the teaching profession is dealing with: role and status, selection and recruitment, evaluation and control inputs and outputs of the system, supply and demand, differentiated funding and remuneration, expectations and teachers' motivation etc.This article attempts to summarize the pros and cons of the two routes in the professional existence and their effects on teaching training skills. The teacher, especially the preschool and primary education teacher, ensures the start for all other professions.
Â
References
Anderson, J. (1996). Public Policy Making: An Introduction, Princeton, NJ.
Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom, Harvard University Press Cambridge.
Cucoș, C. (2002). Pedagogie, Iași: Editura Polirom.
Dimitropoulos, A. (2008). The Bologna process and teacher education structures in Europe:Creating a European Teacher Education Area. ENTEP.
http://entep.bildung.hessen.de/europe_creating_a_european_teacher.pdf. Accesat la 21 iunie 2016
Dye, Th. (1998). Understanding Public Policy, Prentice-Hall.
Gassner,O. (2010). ENTEP and European Teacher Education: Policy Issues Since 2000
în Otmar Gassner, Lucien Kerger, Michael Schratz (eds.)(2010). ENTEP The first ten years after Bologna, Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Iucu, R. (2010). Ten Years after Bologna: towards a European Teacher Education Area în Otmar Gassner, Lucien Kerger, Michael Schratz (eds.)(2010). ENTEP The first ten years after Bologna, Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Jenkins, W. (1978). Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective, London.
Labaree, D. (2010). Someone Has to Fail.The Zero-Sum Game of Public Schooling, Harvard University Press.
Miroiu, A. (2001). Introducere în analiza politicilor publice, București: Editura Punct.
Popescu, L.-G. (2014). Politici publice și guvernanța Uniunii Europene, București: Editura Economică.
Smit, B.e (2003), Can Qualitative Research Inform Policy Implementation? Evidence and Arguments from a Developing Country Context, în Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Volume 4, No. 3, Art. 6
Thoening, J.-Cl. (1985). Les politiques publiques, Vol IV, P. XIII, în Madeleine Grawitz, Jean Leca, Traite de science politique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Young, E. & Quinn, L. (2002). Cum se scrie un studiu de politici publice efectiv, (ed. online).
*** Asociația Națională a Colegiilor și Liceelor Pedagogice (2016). Rezoluția Conferinței Naționale ANCLPhttp://www.pedacj.ro/conferinta-nationala-a-colegiilor-si-liceelor-pedagogice-din-romania-2016. Accesat la data de 21 iunie 2016
*** Raport de audit al performanţei. Analiza fundamentării şi evoluţiei situaţiei obiectivului privindcreşterea procentului absolvenţilor de învăţământ superior, în conformitate cu prevederile Strategiei Europa 2020. Curtea de conturi a României,
http://www.curteadeconturi.ro/Publicatii/SINTEZAAPInvsup.pdf. Accesat la data de 3 iulie 2016
